To be a Catholic
is to be
a contrarian.
This is a funny thing to think,
since much of the popular narrative
of modern life
would seem to suggest
very much
the opposite.
But that goes hand-in-hand
with those origins,
all that resentment,
that's been playing out
for some five hundred years.
But all the same it's true.
It was a contrarian
that suggested
Roman life
wasn't good enough
to dictate cultural norms.
I don't think it was
a rebellion
or yearning
for independence
that provoked this,
or even the idea
of a messiah,
but an awareness
that there was
a better way
to live,
that acknowledged
basic human dignity.
Which is funny,
since so many early Catholics
died in undignified ways
in order to argue this.
To be a Catholic
you sort of hear
about these early martyrs
a lot;
they're not buried
in the rush
to reach
some philosophical point
explaining why we had
to leave
the faith
in order
to purify it.
But to hear Christians
talk about persecution
today,
the "war on Christmas,"
it's not really
to understand
what they mean,
and less so
coming from a Catholic.
To be a Catholic
is to be a contrarian.
Even among Catholics
it's not good enough
to say you're Catholic,
because even Catholics
can't agree
what being Catholic
means.
So even among Catholics
there are contrarians,
which is why I say
to be Catholic
is to be a contrarian.
It's to be
out of step
with the world,
which has been so busy
trying to distance itself
from that time
when the whole world
seemed Catholic.
(And I do say "seemed,"
which is to say,
to the European world.)
(Which itself
is a distinction lost
on all those
still fighting
a war they seem
to have won.)
I could go on,
but that wouldn't be
very catholic
(and again,
I guess it would.)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.